20.8 C
London
Thursday, July 2, 2026

admin

spot_img

BPSU Chief backs Wilson’s stern comments on MOU signing

Please enable JavaScript.fp-color-play{opacity:0.65;}.controlbutton{fill:#fff;}play-sharp-fill ...

Chamber President hails Sandals’ $100M Beaches Exuma investment as economic boost

NASSAU, BAHAMAS- Sandals Resorts International’s $100 million investment to transform its Emerald Bay Resort into Beaches Exuma demonstrates the company’s commitment to the destination...

‘Independent oversight body of oil sector not necessary’ – Jagdeo  

‘Independent oversight body of oil sector not necessary’ – Jagdeo   Aug 01, 2024 News Vice President, Dr. Bharrat Jagdeo – Govt. has enough transparent oversight already Kaieteur News – Months after promising that his government will install a Petroleum Commission when the time is right, Vice President, Bharrat Jagdeo is now changing his tune that independent oversight of Guyana’s oil and gas sector is not really necessary. Speaking at his at his weekly press-conference on Wednesday, Jagdeo said the PPP/C-led administration has done enough already to transparently monitor the oil sector.   “There is no magic with a Petroleum Commission”, Jagdeo told Kaieteur News in response to a question posed to him by the media house on when he will put the independent body in place. “There is no magic, we have given our agencies the tools to manage the sector.” Showing his frustration having been asked about the body, Jagdeo continued: “For Christ’s sake, you know what it would take to get that in place, the hard work that it will take to get that in place,” before adding that the APNU+AFC opposition could have done it in the five years they were in office. “They did nothing, we did in a record time and now we have expanded the scope for a modern law from 1986”, he said. The VP is of the view that a Petroleum Commission might not make any sense because the technical persons that will be nominated to sit on the body will be politicians too.  “They would put a Vincent Adams, he is a great technical man although he is a politician (just) like how they put their executive member on the PPC (Public Procurement Commission) then say oh it acts independently- It’s a sham”, Jagdeo argued. Different tune Back in January this year, the Vice President was singing a different tune. In fact, when the question was raised then at his first press conference for the year, Jagdeo assured that the government will honour its promise to have a Petroleum Commission when the time is right. Such a regulatory body is established by a government to oversee and manage the exploration, development, and production of petroleum resources within its jurisdiction. It ensures compliance with laws and regulations, manages licences and permits, and often plays a role in promoting sustainable and efficient utilization of petroleum resources. At that press conference, Jagdeo assured that this has not been removed from the government’s agenda. He had said, “The petroleum commission, we said we are building capacity in the Ministry (of Natural Resources).” He further explained during this period where the government is focused on creating a fortified framework for managing accountability in the sector, swifter action would be needed for a number of critical matters. He alluded that this is not the type of approach one would normally see from a technically outfitted body like a Petroleum Commission.  Jagdeo said it is as a result of the government’s insistence on a rapid build out of the management framework for the sector that a new Natural Resource Fund Law was passed, a new Petroleum Activities Law was enacted and a revamped model production sharing agreement for deepwater and shallow water concessions came into being. “All of those things had to be driven politically to achieve them. A technical body would not have the same sense of urgency to do that,” he said adding, “…Anybody who is assessing this sector from 2020 to now would have seen the massive changes in the tools available to the country to manage this sector…Only the jaundiced would not see that…” Naysayers aside, Jagdeo assured back in January that the government’s ultimate goal is a Petroleum Commission to complement other advancements in the sector. Importance of oversight Contrary to the Vice President’s statement, the Petroleum Commissions can nonetheless perform various functions as designated by the necessary legislation. After discovering petroleum in 2007, Ghana for example, established its Petroleum Commission four years later with a mandate “to regulate, manage and co-ordinate all activities in the Upstream Petroleum industry…” Its functions entail importantly, to analyze petroleum economic information and submit economic forecasts on petroleum to the Minister; to receive and store petroleum data, manage a national petroleum repository and at the request of the Minister, undertake reconnaissance exploration including data acquisition; assess and approve appraisal programmes; advise the Minister on matters related to petroleum activities such as field development plans, plans for the development of petroleum transportation, processing, and treatment facilities, decommissioning plans for petroleum fields and petroleum infrastructure; monitor petroleum activities and carry out the necessary inspection and audit related activities that include “any other function related to the object of the Commission or assigned to it under any enactment.” In its analysis of the 2011 law, the Offshore Journal described the Ghana Petroleum Commission as having functions that extend beyond that of any other regulatory body in Ghana. “It is a supra-national regulator with diverse powers, which stem from its tripartite role. In addition to being a regulator in the technical sense, the Commission is also the manager of Ghana’s petroleum resources, and as coordinator of policies in relation to them, the Commission acts as the interface between the government and industry.” Government agencies and departments are required to cooperate with the Commission. The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate is a governmental specialist directorate and administrative body. Established in 1972, it reports to the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. With the same functions as a Petroleum Commission, that body’s duties include being an advisor to the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. It has a “national responsibility for the data from the Norwegian continental shelf. Our data, overview and analyses constitute a crucial factual basis on which the activities are founded. It said it is the driving force for realising the resource potential by emphasising “long-term solutions, upside opportunities, economies of scale and joint operations, as well as ensuring that at times – critical resources are not lost.” That body said it “sets frameworks, stipulates regulations and makes decisions in areas where it has been delegated authority. Further, we are responsible for conducting metering audits and collecting fees from the petroleum industry.” The body also contributes to “administrative competence, mapping of resources and petroleum data administration.” It has about 70 teams with designated mandates and the teams are delegated authority for products, processes and quality. It was noted in the 2019, US$20M World Bank loan document that Guyana had completed, independently and with donor support, a review of the existing oil and gas sector governance structure and had legal and policy drafts in place including an oil and gas policy (2016), local content policy (2017 & 2018), the “Petroleum Commission Bill” (2017 & 2018). It said in December 2017, the Ministry of Finance had requested the US$20M Credit from the World Bank “aimed at supporting broad governance reforms of its O&G sector with the objective to address economic and social impacts.” Related Similar Articles

‘Independent oversight body of oil sector not necessary’  

‘Independent oversight body of oil sector not necessary’   Aug 01, 2024 News Vice President, Dr. Bharrat Jagdeo – Jagdeo say Govt. has enough transparent oversight already Kaieteur News – Months after promising that his government will install a Petroleum Commission when the time is right, Vice President, Bharrat Jagdeo is now changing his tune that independent oversight of Guyana’s oil and gas sector is not really necessary. Speaking at his at his weekly press-conference on Wednesday, Jagdeo said the PPP/C-led administration has done enough already to transparently monitor the oil sector.   “There is no magic with a Petroleum Commission”, Jagdeo told Kaieteur News in response to a question posed to him by the media house on when he will put the independent body in place. “There is no magic, we have given our agencies the tools to manage the sector.” Showing his frustration having been asked about the body, Jagdeo continued: “For Christ’s sake, you know what it would take to get that in place, the hard work that it will take to get that in place,” before adding that the APNU+AFC opposition could have done it in the five years they were in office. “They did nothing, we did in a record time and now we have expanded the scope for a modern law from 1986”, he said. The VP is of the view that a Petroleum Commission might not make any sense because the technical persons that will be nominated to sit on the body will be politicians too.  “They would put a Vincent Adams, he is a great technical man although he is a politician (just) like how they put their executive member on the PPC (Public Procurement Commission) then say oh it acts independently- It’s a sham”, Jagdeo argued. Different tune Back in January this year, the Vice President was singing a different tune. In fact, when the question was raised then at his first press conference for the year, Jagdeo assured that the government will honour its promise to have a Petroleum Commission when the time is right. Such a regulatory body is established by a government to oversee and manage the exploration, development, and production of petroleum resources within its jurisdiction. It ensures compliance with laws and regulations, manages licences and permits, and often plays a role in promoting sustainable and efficient utilization of petroleum resources. At that press conference, Jagdeo assured that this has not been removed from the government’s agenda. He had said, “The petroleum commission, we said we are building capacity in the Ministry (of Natural Resources).” He further explained during this period where the government is focused on creating a fortified framework for managing accountability in the sector, swifter action would be needed for a number of critical matters. He alluded that this is not the type of approach one would normally see from a technically outfitted body like a Petroleum Commission.  Jagdeo said it is as a result of the government’s insistence on a rapid build out of the management framework for the sector that a new Natural Resource Fund Law was passed, a new Petroleum Activities Law was enacted and a revamped model production sharing agreement for deepwater and shallow water concessions came into being. “All of those things had to be driven politically to achieve them. A technical body would not have the same sense of urgency to do that,” he said adding, “…Anybody who is assessing this sector from 2020 to now would have seen the massive changes in the tools available to the country to manage this sector…Only the jaundiced would not see that…” Naysayers aside, Jagdeo assured back in January that the government’s ultimate goal is a Petroleum Commission to complement other advancements in the sector. Importance of oversight Contrary to the Vice President’s statement, the Petroleum Commissions can nonetheless perform various functions as designated by the necessary legislation. After discovering petroleum in 2007, Ghana for example, established its Petroleum Commission four years later with a mandate “to regulate, manage and co-ordinate all activities in the Upstream Petroleum industry…” Its functions entail importantly, to analyze petroleum economic information and submit economic forecasts on petroleum to the Minister; to receive and store petroleum data, manage a national petroleum repository and at the request of the Minister, undertake reconnaissance exploration including data acquisition; assess and approve appraisal programmes; advise the Minister on matters related to petroleum activities such as field development plans, plans for the development of petroleum transportation, processing, and treatment facilities, decommissioning plans for petroleum fields and petroleum infrastructure; monitor petroleum activities and carry out the necessary inspection and audit related activities that include “any other function related to the object of the Commission or assigned to it under any enactment.” In its analysis of the 2011 law, the Offshore Journal described the Ghana Petroleum Commission as having functions that extend beyond that of any other regulatory body in Ghana. “It is a supra-national regulator with diverse powers, which stem from its tripartite role. In addition to being a regulator in the technical sense, the Commission is also the manager of Ghana’s petroleum resources, and as coordinator of policies in relation to them, the Commission acts as the interface between the government and industry.” Government agencies and departments are required to cooperate with the Commission. The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate is a governmental specialist directorate and administrative body. Established in 1972, it reports to the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. With the same functions as a Petroleum Commission, that body’s duties include being an advisor to the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. It has a “national responsibility for the data from the Norwegian continental shelf. Our data, overview and analyses constitute a crucial factual basis on which the activities are founded. It said it is the driving force for realising the resource potential by emphasising “long-term solutions, upside opportunities, economies of scale and joint operations, as well as ensuring that at times – critical resources are not lost.” That body said it “sets frameworks, stipulates regulations and makes decisions in areas where it has been delegated authority. Further, we are responsible for conducting metering audits and collecting fees from the petroleum industry.” The body also contributes to “administrative competence, mapping of resources and petroleum data administration.” It has about 70 teams with designated mandates and the teams are delegated authority for products, processes and quality. It was noted in the 2019, US$20M World Bank loan document that Guyana had completed, independently and with donor support, a review of the existing oil and gas sector governance structure and had legal and policy drafts in place including an oil and gas policy (2016), local content policy (2017 & 2018), the “Petroleum Commission Bill” (2017 & 2018). It said in December 2017, the Ministry of Finance had requested the US$20M Credit from the World Bank “aimed at supporting broad governance reforms of its O&G sector with the objective to address economic and social impacts.” Related Similar Articles

Hess 2Q profit beats on strong Guyana output

Hess 2Q profit beats on strong Guyana output Aug 01, 2024 News Hess logo is seen displayed in this illustration taken April 10, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo (Reuters) – Hess Corp (HES.N), beat estimates for second-quarter profit on Wednesday, helped by sharply higher oil production in Guyana and stronger prices. The South American country and its lucrative oil assets are at the center of a dispute between Hess, Chevron (CVX.N), and Exxon (XOM.N). Last October, Hess agreed to sell itself to Chevron for $53 billion in stock, but the deal has been stalled by a regulatory review and challenged by Exxon, which claims a right to Hess’s Guyana assets. Hess’s production rose 27.6% to 494,000 barrels of oil and gas per day (boepd), on nearly 75% year-over-year increase in Guyana to 192,000 bpd. Its Bakken shale output also rose, the company said. It, however, expects a fall in current-quarter production due to planned downtime in Guyana and Southeast Asia. Third-quarter net production is expected to be in the range of 460,000 boepd to 470,000 boepd. Hess said it expects its Guyana output to fall 10% as a natural gas pipeline is connected this quarter, and expects its North Dakota output to drop 4.5% on planned maintenance. The company’s average realized crude oil selling price also rose nearly 13% to $80.29 per barrel in the second quarter. A three-person arbitration panel is expected to decide on the dispute with Exxon. Exxon believes the process could extend to 2025 while both Chevron and Hess expect a resolution by the end of the year. Hess’ quarterly profit of $2.62 per share beat analysts’ average estimate of $2.48 per share, according to LSEG data. Back in April Hess Corporation had announced that its profits leapt by $626M in the first quarter of 2024 thanks to higher production volumes in the Bakken shale in the US and the Stabroek block offshore Guyana. Back then Hess’ net income, the company said, was US$972M in the three months ended 31 March, compared to $346 million in the first quarter of 2023, according to the company’s latest earnings report. This would mean that Hess’s profits have almost tripled over the previous reporting period. According to Hess, its overall net production of oil and gas was 476,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, up 27 percent from 374,000 barrels of oil per day (bpd) in 2023. The Bakken production surged by 27,000 (bpd), according to Hess, “while Guyana offered up an additional 78,000 (bpd) this quarter.” The first quarter results “substantially outperformed” expectations, according to a report from analyst firm TD Cowen back then. Overall production beat projections by 9 percent, while Hess’ Guyana output beat consensus by 28 percent, Cowen had noted. Related Similar Articles

Killing of Hamas chief in Iran stirs fears of retaliation

Killing of Hamas chief in Iran stirs fears of retaliation Aug 01, 2024 News Palestinian group Hamas’ top leader, Ismail Haniyeh speaks during a press conference in Tehran, Iran, March 26, 2024. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS/File Photo CAIRO/DUBAI, July 31 (Reuters) – Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh was assassinated in the Iranian capital Tehran early on Wednesday morning, an attack that drew threats of revenge on Israel and fuelled further concern that the conflict in Gaza was turning into a wider Middle East war. The Palestinian Islamist militant group and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards confirmed Haniyeh’s death. The Guards said it took place hours after he attended a swearing-in ceremony for Iran’s new president. Although the strike on Haniyeh was widely assumed to have been carried out by Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government made no claim of responsibility and said it would make no comment on the killing. Haniyeh was killed by a missile that hit him “directly” in a state guesthouse where he was staying, Khalil Al-Hayya, a senior Hamas official, told a news conference in Tehran, quoting witnesses who were with Haniyeh. “Now we are waiting for the full investigation from the (Iranian) brothers,” Al-Hayya said. Haniyeh, normally based in Qatar, had been the face of Hamas’s international diplomacy as the war set off by the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7 has raged in Gaza. He had been taking part in internationally-brokered indirect talks on reaching a ceasefire in the Palestinian enclave. The assassination occurred less than 24 hours after Israel claimed to have killed Hezbollah’s most senior military commander in the Lebanese capital Beirut in retaliation for a deadly rocket strike in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. Two Lebanese security sources said on Wednesday that the body of Hezbollah operations chief Fuad Shukr had been found in the rubble of a building hit by an Israeli airstrike in Beirut’s southern suburbs. Netanyahu made no mention of Haniyeh’s killing in a televised statement on Wednesday evening but said Israel had delivered crushing blows to Iran’s proxies of late, including Hamas and Hezbollah, and would respond forcefully to any attack. “Citizens of Israel, challenging days lie ahead. Since the strike in Beirut there are threats sounding from all directions. We are prepared for any scenario and we will stand united and determined against any threat. Israel will exact a heavy price for any aggression against us from any arena,” he said. The latest events appear to set back chances of any imminent ceasefire agreement in the nearly 10-month-old war in Gaza between Israel and the Iran-backed Hamas. Hamas’ armed wing said in a statement Haniyeh’s killing would “take the battle to new dimensions and have major repercussions”. Vowing to retaliate, Iran declared three days of national mourning and said the U.S. bore responsibility because of its support for Israel. ISRAEL INVITES ‘HARSH PUNISHMENT’, KHAMENEI SAYS Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Israel had provided the grounds for “harsh punishment for itself” and it was Tehran’s duty to avenge Haniyeh’s death. Iranian forces have already made strikes directly on Israel earlier in the Gaza war. Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer told a briefing with journalists that Israel was committed to Gaza ceasefire negotiations and securing the release of Israeli hostages held by Palestinian militants in Gaza. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, at an event in Singapore, sidestepped a question on Haniyeh’s killing, saying a ceasefire deal in Gaza was key to avoiding wider regional escalation. He told Channel News Asia that the U.S. had neither been aware of nor involved in the killing. Qatar, which has been brokering talks aimed at halting the fighting in Gaza along with Egypt, condemned Haniyeh’s killing as a dangerous escalation of the conflict. “Political assassinations and continued targeting of civilians in Gaza while talks continue leads us to ask, how can mediation succeed when one party assassinates the negotiator on other side?” Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani said on X. Egypt said Haniyeh’s assassination showed a lack of political will on Israel’s part to calm tensions. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas condemned the killing and Palestinian factions in the Israeli-occupied West Bank called for a strike and mass demonstrations. In Israel, the mood was buoyant as Israelis welcomed what they saw as a major achievement in the war against Hamas. Residents in besieged Gaza feared Haniyeh’s death would prolong the fighting that has devastated the enclave. “This news is scary. We feel that he was like a father to us,” said Gaza resident Hachem Al-Saati. MESHAAL IS LIKELY SUCCESSOR TO HANIYEH Haniyeh’s most likely successor is Khaled Meshaal, his deputy-in-exile who lives in Qatar, analysts and Hamas officials said. Under Meshaal, Hamas emerged as an ever more important player in the Middle East conflict due to his charisma, popularity and regional standing, analysts said. Meshaal narrowly survived an attempt on his life in Jordan ordered by Netanyahu in 1997. Appointed to the top Hamas job in 2017, Haniyeh moved between Turkey and Qatar’s capital Doha, escaping the travel curbs of the blockaded Gaza Strip and enabling him to act as a negotiator in the truce talks or to talk to Hamas’ ally Iran. Three of his sons were killed in an Israeli airstrike in April. His deputy Saleh Al-Arouri was killed in January by Israel, leaving Yehya Al-Sinwar, the Hamas chief in Gaza and the architect of the Oct. 7 attack on Israel, and Zaher Jabarin, the head of the group in the West Bank, in place but in hiding. That assault by Hamas-led fighters killed about 1,200 people in southern Israeli communities and some 250 people were taken to Gaza as hostages, Israeli tallies say. In response, Israel launched a ground and air offensive in the coastal enclave that has killed more than 39,400 people, according to Gaza health officials, and left more than 2 million facing a humanitarian crisis. No end appears to be in sight for Israel’s campaign there as the ceasefire talks falter. Related Similar Articles

Govt. seeks over $40B more in supplementary spending

Govt. seeks over $40B more in supplementary spending Aug 01, 2024 News Kaieteur News – On the back of its record $1.146 trillion budget, the Irfaan Ali Government has returned to the National Assembly for over $40B more to plug into the failing Guyana Sugar Corporation, boost electricity supply and build roads and improvement water systems in the hinterland. Senior Minister in the Office of the President with Responsibility for Finance and the Public Service Dr. Ashni Singh on Wednesday presented Financial Papers Numbers 1 and 2 of 2024 to the National Assembly. According to a press release from his ministry, Financial Paper Number 1 for which the Minister is seeking approval caters for Supplementary Estimates (Current) in relation to advances made from the Contingency Fund totalling $8.6 billion for the period 2024-04-01 to 2024-07-30 while Financial Paper Number 2 caters for Supplementary Estimates (Current and Capital) totalling $32.2 billion for the period ending 2024-12-31. Among the major sectors is electricity where a total of $16 billion is being sought for the Guyana Power and Light (GPL) of which $4 billion is under Financial Paper 1 and a $12 billion Supplementary request in Financial Paper 2, the release stated. “It would be recalled that President Irfaan Ali had announced that Government would be absorbing the impact of rising fuel prices on the cost of services provided by electricity companies to ensure that it does not translate to higher electricity prices for Guyanese,” according to the release. Additionally, the ministry said government is seeking a supplementary approval of $1.1 billion for additional resources to support electricity companies in Linden, Lethem, Mabaruma and Matthews Ridge. Importantly, the Government has implemented several measures to mitigate the rising cost of fuel including the removal of the Excise Tax on this commodity since March 2022 resulting in over $80 billion in savings to citizens annually. Further, to bring greater reliability in terms of the supply of power being provided by GPL, in May this year, 36-megawatts of power was added to the national grid through an agreement with the Turkish Company Karpowership. Another sector under which Government is seeking approval for a supplementary sum is the agriculture sector including a sum of $9.5 billion for the Guyana Sugar Corporation (GUYSUCO) as part of the Government’s continued efforts to revitalise the industry in line with its commitment to the country and to re-energize local communities devastated by the unconscionable actions of the country’s former Governing party – A Partnership for National Unity/Alliance For Change (APNU/AFC) Coalition. The former administration under its tenure closed several sugar estates during the period 2015-2020.  This sector had traditionally been one of the major sectors of the country’s economy upon which many citizens depend for their livelihood. Additionally, in Financial Paper Number2, Government is seeking a supplementary sum of $2.3 billion to settle outstanding payments owed to numerous suppliers of goods and services to a number of Government agencies over the years. Financial Paper 2 also caters for a sum of $1.6 billion under the Ministry of Public Works for Sea and River Defence works, $297.4 million to support the operations of the Transport and Harbours Department, $159.2 million for the completion of the Bartica Stelling and $680.5 million to facilitate critical upgrades to Ferry Vessels. Further, as Government continues to improve connectivity across the country especially in the infrastructure sector, Government is seeking an additional $904 million for the construction and rehabilitation of hinterland roads and $600 million for the completion of infrastructure for the critical supply of water to these far-flung communities. Related Similar Articles

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Must read

spot_img